Viability assessment of livers donated after circulatory determination of death during normothermic regional perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (A-NRP) allows in-situ reperfusion and recovery of abdominal organs metabolism in donors after circulatory death (DCD). Besides improving liver transplantation outcomes, liver injury and function can be assessed during A-NRP. METHODS: To refine liver viability assessment during A-NRP, prospectively collected data of controlled DCD donors managed at our Institution between October 2019 and May 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline characteristics, procedural variables and A-NRP parameters of donors whose liver was successfully transplanted were compared to those of donors whose liver was discarded. RESULTS: Twenty-seven donors were included and in 20 (74%) the liver was accepted (positive outcome). No differences between study groups were observed concerning baseline characteristics and warm ischemia times (WIT). Initial lactate levels were positively correlated with functional WIT (r2 = 0.4, p = 0.04), whereas transaminase levels were not. Blood flow during A-NRP was comparable, whereas oxygen consumption (VO2 ) was significantly higher in the positive outcome group after 1 h. Time courses of lactate, AST and ALT were significantly different between study groups (p < 0.001). Donors whose liver was accepted showed faster lactate clearance, a difference which was amplified by normalizing lactate clearance to oxygen delivery (DO2 ) and VO2 . Lactate clearance was correlated to transaminase levels and DO2 -normalized lactate clearance was the parameter best discriminating between study groups. CONCLUSIONS: DO2 -normalized lactate clearance may represent an element of liver viability assessment during A-NRP.

Clinical assessment of liver metabolism during hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion using microdialysis.

BACKGROUND: While growing evidence supports the use of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) in liver transplantation, its effects on liver metabolism are still incompletely understood. METHODS: To assess liver metabolism during HOPE using microdialysis (MD), we conducted an open-label, observational pilot study on 10 consecutive grafts treated with dual-HOPE (D-HOPE). Microdialysate and perfusate levels of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate, and flavin mononucleotide (FMN) were measured during back table preparation and D-HOPE and correlated to graft function and patient outcome. RESULTS: Median (IQR) MD and D-HOPE time was 228 (210, 245) and 116 (103, 143) min. Three grafts developed early allograft dysfunction (EAD), with one requiring retransplantation. During D-HOPE, MD glucose and lactate levels increased (ANOVA = 9.88 [p = 0.01] and 3.71 [p = 0.08]). Their 2nd-hour levels were higher in EAD group and positively correlated with L-GrAFT score. 2nd-hour MD glucose and lactate were also positively correlated with cold ischemia time, macrovesicular steatosis, weight gain during D-HOPE, and perfusate FMN. These correlations were not apparent when perfusate levels were considered. In contrast, MD FMN levels invariably dropped steeply after D-HOPE start, whereas perfusate FMN was higher in dysfunctioning grafts. CONCLUSION: MD glucose and lactate during D-HOPE are markers of hepatocellular injury and could represent additional elements of the viability assessment.

Cost analysis of laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of cholecystocholedocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: Evidence from controlled trials and meta-analyses suggests that laparoendoscopic rendezvous (LERV) is preferable to sequential treatment in the management of common bile duct stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With this retrospective analysis of a prospective database that included consecutive patients treated for cholecystocholedocholithiasis at our institution between January 2007 and July 2015, we compared LERV with sequential treatment. The primary endpoint was global cost, defined as the cost/patient/hospital stay, and the secondary end points were efficacy and morbidity. Fisher's exact test or Mann-Whitney test was used. RESULTS: Of a total of 249 consecutive patients, 143 underwent LERV (group A) and 106 a two-stage procedure (group B). Based on an average cost of €613 for 1 day of hospital stay in the General Surgery Department, the overall median cost of treatment was €6403 for group A and €8194 for group B (p < 0.001). Operative time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001), and length of hospital stay was significantly longer for group B (p < 0.001). No mortality in either group was observed. The postoperative complications rate was significantly higher in group B than in group A (24.5 vs. 10.5%; p = 0.003). No significant difference in the postoperative pancreatitis rate or the number of patients with increased serum amylase at 24 h was observed in either group. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that LERV is preferable to sequential treatment not only in terms of less morbidity, but also of lower costs accrued by a shorter hospital stay. However, the longer operative time raises multiple organizational issues in the coordination of surgery and endoscopy services.